Sangwon Yoon

• Yoon, Sangwon; Speyer, Renee; Cordier, Reinie; Aunio, Pirjo Annika & Hakkarainen, Airi (2020). A systematic review evaluating psychometric properties of parent or caregiver report instruments on child maltreatment: Part 1: Content validity. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse.  ISSN 1524-8380.  s 1- 19 . doi: 10.1177/1524838019898456 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv. Vis sammendrag

  AIMS: Child maltreatment (CM) is a serious public health issue, affecting over half of all children globally. Although most CM is perpetrated by parents or caregivers and their reports of CM is more accurate than professionals or children, parent or caregiver report instruments measuring CM have never been systematically evaluated for their content validity, the most important psychometric property. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the content validity of all current parent or caregiver report CM instruments. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in CINAHL, Embase, ERIC, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Sociological Abstracts; gray literature was retrieved through reference checking. Eligible studies needed to report on content validity of instruments measuring CM perpetrated and reported by parents or caregivers. The quality of studies and content validity of the instruments were evaluated using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments guidelines. RESULTS: Fifteen studies reported on the content validity of 15 identified instruments. The study quality was generally poor. The content validity of the instruments was overall sufficient, but most instruments did not provide high-quality evidence for content validity. CONCLUSIONS: Most instruments included in this review showed promising content validity. The International Society for the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect Child Abuse Screening Tool for use in Trial appears to be the most promising, followed by the Family Maltreatment-Child Abuse criteria. However, firm conclusions cannot be drawn due to the low quality of evidence for content validity. Further studies are required to evaluate the remaining psychometric properties for recommending parent or caregiver report CM instruments.

• Yoon, Sangwon; Speyer, Renee; Cordier, Reinie; Aunio, Pirjo Annika & Hakkarainen, Airi (2020). A systematic review evaluating psychometric properties of parent or caregiver report instruments on child maltreatment: Part 2: Internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, structural validity, hypothesis testing, Cross-Cultural Validity, and Criterion Validity. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse.  ISSN 1524-8380.  Advanced online publication, s 1- 20 . doi: 10.1177/1524838020915591 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.

Se alle arbeider i Cristin

• Yoon, Sangwon (2020). HOW TO EVALUATE THE CONTENT VALIDITY OF HEALTH-RELATED MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS: BASED ON A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ASSESSING THE CONTENT VALIDITY OF CAREGIVER-REPORTED INSTRUMENTS ON CHILD ABUSE. Vis sammendrag

  The choice of high-quality measurement instruments that accurately assess health condition is strongly determined by their content validity. However, content validity is complex and challenging to evaluate; so far, there is no comprehensive and standardized criteria for assessing the quality of the content validity of health-related measurement instruments. Accordingly, the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) group has developed a comprehensive methodological guideline for systematically assessing the content validity of healthrelated measurements. The COSMIN guideline includes: (1) a framework for terms and definitions related to three aspects of content validity (relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility); (2) a checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on the content validity of instruments; (3) criteria for evaluating each result of single studies on the content validity of instruments; and (4) a rating system summarizing the results of all the studies on each aspect of content validity and grading the quality of all the evidence used to evaluate both the quality of the study design and the content validity. This presentation describes how to assess the quality of the content validity of health-related measurement instruments according to the COSMIN methodological guideline, using as an example a systematic literature review assessing the content validity of caregiver-reported instruments on child abuse and neglect.

• Yoon, Sangwon (2020). How to select high-quality, health-related measurement instruments: Based on a systematic literature review evaluating the measurement properties of parent-reported instruments on child maltreatment. Vis sammendrag

  The use of measurement instruments that accurately assess the variable or health status to be measured in healthcare research or clinical practice is very important for research validity and evidence-based interventions. However, so far, there have been no comprehensive and standardized criteria for evaluating the quality of health-related measurement instruments, nor definitions for measurement properties (e.g., validity and reliability). Accordingly, the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) group has developed comprehensive guidelines for systematically evaluating the measurement properties of health-related measurement instruments. The COSMIN guidelines consist of: (1) a framework for terms and definitions of each measurement property for health-related measurement instruments; (2) a checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of the instruments; (3) criteria for assessing each result of single studies on the measurement properties of the instruments; and (4) a rating system summarizing results of all studies on each measurement property and grading the quality of all evidence used for assessing both the quality of the study and the measurement properties. This presentation explains how to evaluate the quality of health-related measurement instruments and to select high-quality instruments in accordance with the COSMIN guidelines, using as an example a systematic literature review evaluating the measurement properties of parent-reported instruments to measure child maltreatment. (PDF) How to select high-quality, health-related measurement instruments: Based on a systematic literature review evaluating the measurement properties of parent-reported instruments on child maltreatment.

• Yoon, Sangwon (2014). Deriving Code Sets for Pupils with Physical Disabilities from the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, for Children and Youth (ICF-CY).

Se alle arbeider i Cristin